Uploaded image for project: 'SAFe Program'
  1. SAFe Program
  2. SP-796

Simulation of beam models and visibilities DD corrections

Change Owns to Parent OfsSet start and due date...
    XporterXMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Data Processing
    • Hide

      In order to perform a fair and consistent comparison of ART DD imaging and calibration algorithms for generating SKA1 data products (SP-792) it will be important to agree upon, simulate and publish (scripts and/or data) for a small number of well defined input visibility data sets. Where at all possible, this should be built upon existing SKA1 simulations work (see linked features).

      Show
      In order to perform a fair and consistent comparison of ART DD imaging and calibration algorithms for generating SKA1 data products ( SP-792 ) it will be important to agree upon, simulate and publish (scripts and/or data) for a small number of well defined input visibility data sets. Where at all possible, this should be built upon existing SKA1 simulations work (see linked features).
    • Hide

      <to be discussed with the FO>

      • Demonstrate that the SKA1-LOW simulator (OSKAR) and the LOFAR software predict the same instrumental response for SKA1-LOW (main goal for PI6).
      • Demonstrate that the SKA simulation can simulate realistic DD effects for SKA1-LOW that include both the instrumental response and an ionospheric propagation model (stretch goal for PI6).
      • Simulation scripts and data sets made available to begin comparison of the DD calibration and imaging algorithms identified in SP-792 (stretch goal for PI6)
      Show
      <to be discussed with the FO> Demonstrate that the SKA1-LOW simulator (OSKAR) and the LOFAR software predict the same instrumental response for SKA1-LOW (main goal for PI6). Demonstrate that the SKA simulation can simulate realistic DD effects for SKA1-LOW that include both the instrumental response and an ionospheric propagation model (stretch goal for PI6). Simulation scripts and data sets made available to begin comparison of the DD calibration and imaging algorithms identified in SP-792  (stretch goal for PI6)
    • 2
    • 2
    • 6.5
    • Team_SCHAAP
    • Sprint 5
    • Hide

      DPPT review of historical tickets for close-out:

      The work is now superseded and the outcomes of this feature further developed. Therefore this ticket is being closed. 

      Show
      DPPT review of historical tickets for close-out: The work is now superseded and the outcomes of this feature further developed. Therefore this ticket is being closed. 
    • 14.2
    • Stories Completed, Outcomes Reviewed
    • PI22 - UNCOVERED

    Description

      Step 1: there is an ongoing discussion concerning the validity of the simulated polarisation response for SKA1-LOW. In PI5, the SKA1-LOW beam model was implemented in the LOFAR software. A comparison should be made between the results produced by the two independent software package to build confidence in these simulations and/or pinpoint errors that need to be corrected. At the end of this step, we should have two packages that predict the same instrumental response for SKA1-LOW. This is the main goal in PI6

      Step 2: These simulations of the instrumental response should be combined with the simulation of ionospheric corruptions developed in SP-651 to allow realistic simulation of DD effects along a given line of sight including both instrumental and ionospheric effects. This is a stretch goal for Pi6.

      Step 3: Create and make available a small number of reference visibility data sets for SKA1-LOW with varying levels of DD corruptions (beam, ionosphere). These simulations should be accompanied by a set of reference beam images/models and/or the scripts for generating them. These should be large enough to cover the first few side lobes of the primary beam and do not need to generated at the full time or frequency resolution of the visibility simulation. Another way to keep the size of the simulated visibility set manageable is to use fewer stations, for example those identified for AR1 or AR2. This is a stretch goal for PI6.

      Step 4: Set up a similar simulation for SKA1-MID building on the results from SP-651 to model the troposphere. Due to capacity constraints, this will not be done in PI6.

      Step 5:  Create and make available a small number of reference visibility data sets for SKA1-MID with varying levels of DD corruptions (beam, troposphere). These simulations should be accompanied by a set of reference beam images/models and/or the scripts for generating them. These should be large enough to cover the first few side lobes of the primary beam and do not need to generated at the full time or frequency resolution of the visibility simulation. Another way to keep the size of the simulated visibility set manageable is to use fewer dishes, for example those identified for AR1 or AR2. This is a stretch goal for PI6. Due to capacity constraints, this will not be done in PI6 

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Structure

            Activity

              People

                r.laing Laing, Robert
                b.mort Mort, Ben
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                1 Start watching this issue

                Feature Progress

                  Story Point Burn-up: (100.00%)

                  Feature Estimate: 2.0

                  IssuesStory Points
                  To Do00.0
                  In Progress   00.0
                  Complete46.5
                  Total46.5

                  Dates

                    Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved:

                    Structure Helper Panel