Uploaded image for project: 'SAFe Program'
  1. SAFe Program
  2. SP-123

Jones matrices for beamforming

Change Owns to Parent OfsSet start and due date...
    XporterXMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Feature
    • Not Assigned
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • Hide

      Clarifies which parts of the system are responsible for
      calculations. Confirms update periods and data rates. Checks that
      there are no architectural or performance issues.

      Show
      Clarifies which parts of the system are responsible for calculations. Confirms update periods and data rates. Checks that there are no architectural or performance issues.
    • 2
    • 6.5
    • 3.4
    • PI24 - UNCOVERED

    Description

      The purpose of this feature is to clarify the process of polarization
      calibration in the phased-array beamformers for pulsar observations
      (especially high-accuracy timing).  At present, there is a rather
      vague requirement for Jones matrices to be provided by SDP to CSP for
      use in beam-forming.

      Starting point is the memo "Real-time Polarization Calibration in the
      Phased-array Beamformers" (van Straten 2015), attached to this ticket as memo.pdf.  Specific questions
      (probably with different answers for MID and LOW):

      1. Requirements for calibration measurements during the observation:
      are Jones matrix elements supposed to come from pre-existing
      calibrations (boresight and/or voltage beams) or is it anticipated
      that calibration observations will be simultaneous or interleaved with
      pulsar observations?

      2. How many beams? For example, Van Straten (2015) suggests one high-precision
      timing beam, on boresight, with correction before summation, for MID.

      3. Calibration before or after summation, or hybrid?

      4. Required update rates.  Correction for instrumental response on
      scales smaller than the bandwidth: this requires matrix convolution -
      how many coefficients?

      5. Inclusion of RFI masking: (how) is this done?

      6. Assume that whoever calculates the Jones matrices does not need to include
      parallactic angle rotation (I think that this must be the case, as leakages should be fixed in the dish.station frame: confirm (otherwise there are implications for the update rate).

      Some work has been done by Grant Hampson and CSP, specifically to assess the data rate for LOW (attached as LMC_datarates.pptx).

      Attachments

        1. memo.pdf
          78 kB
        2. LMC_datarates.pptx
          1022 kB
        3. Beamforming parameter conversion.pdf
          361 kB

        Issue Links

          Structure

            Activity

              People

                r.laing Laing, Robert
                m.bartolini Bartolini, Marco
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                0 Start watching this issue

                Feature Progress

                  Story Point Burn-up: (0%)

                  Feature Estimate: 2.0

                  IssuesStory Points
                  To Do00.0
                  In Progress   00.0
                  Complete00.0
                  Total00.0

                  Dates

                    Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved:

                    Structure Helper Panel