Details
-
Enabler
-
Should have
-
None
-
None
-
SRCnet
-
1
-
0
-
-
-
23.6
-
-
SRCNet0.1 multi-team
Description
This ticket would be used to consolidate and track all feedback received on the linked item SP-4249.
- The sequence of steps when deploying services is not that apparent - if we could please make that well defined, it might be useful
- The service definitions of optional services - should include a potential benefit of deploying the service and eventual usage, memory usage and compute usage - which would help SRCs choose between different services when there is a dearth of memory/compute and a prioritisation call needs to be taken
- Additionally, as Rob mentioned, we should endeavour someone to go through each step mentioned in the document - in the way it is written currently, and see if we are able to achieve what we have written. If so, then well and good, if not, then we have potentially identified the gaps and this will help us make the documentation more robust and accurate.
- Also, please consider the option of including a video - maybe later, which helps in deploying the apps/services/and gives an understanding of a successful deployment.
- Finally, if there could be a failover documentation - possible steps to follow in case errors are encountered, especially for known issues, and possible workarounds, that would be helpful.