Details
-
Enabler
-
Must have
-
None
-
True
-
Data Processing
-
-
-
Intra Program
-
20
-
20
-
0
-
Team_PANDO, Team_SCHAAP
-
Sprint 4
-
-
Overdue
-
-
Low G4 Mid G3
Description
See frame in PI21 Backlog board
Who? (Beneficiaries)
- Pipeline developers.
- System scientists (Commissioning).
- Commissioning and Operations staff planning for science commissioning & verification ahead of and during AA2.
Why? (Benefit hypothesis)
- It is critical that we reach the end of PI21 with either a solid understanding of our scaling strategy for AA2, or the ability to make a reasoned pivot.
- Needs much more detail about drivers for reviewing at this stage.
What? (Acceptance criteria)
- By the end of PI21 we have a demonstrated performance and scalability of the Low self-calibration & imaging pipeline working on a small number of nodes (4-10 per self-calibration subband) using inter- and intra-node parallelism
- Choice of algorithms, (multi-node parallelism using frequency chunks: SCHAAP; faceting with shared data reads: PANDO)
- Bottlenecks & reason for bottlenecks - i.e. if we do not get roughly 10x speedup from running on 10 nodes, why not? (benchmarking: SCOOP, SCHAAP; reorder step in DP3: PANDO)
- We have documented for both DP3 and WSClean a "reasonable" extrapolation to what performance we would expect for Low/Mid AA2 ICAL (outcome of benchmarking: SCOOP, SCHAAP)
- Using current state-of-the-art software,
- Assuming future optimisations.
Attachments
Issue Links
- links to