Uploaded image for project: 'SAFe Program'
  1. SAFe Program
  2. SP-2738

Cross-validation of the EM simulations of SKALA4.1 with HARP

Change Owns to Parent OfsSet start and due date...
    XporterXMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Data Processing
    • Hide

      Simulations of SKA1 LOW data are important for driving the development of SDP pipelines and for the analysis of SKA1 data for a number of science use cases (eg EoR) that are very sensitive to the spatial and frequency behaviour of the LOW station beam. 

      Improving our tooling for this will enable more sophisticated tests to be carried out before SKA data is available and, in the longer term, analysis of SKA data products against simulations which is anticipated to greatly help improve understanding of how to optimise the use of the telescope. 

      Show
      Simulations of SKA1 LOW data are important for driving the development of SDP pipelines and for the analysis of SKA1 data for a number of science use cases (eg EoR) that are very sensitive to the spatial and frequency behaviour of the LOW station beam.  Improving our tooling for this will enable more sophisticated tests to be carried out before SKA data is available and, in the longer term, analysis of SKA data products against simulations which is anticipated to greatly help improve understanding of how to optimise the use of the telescope. 
    • Hide

      A report compiling the comparison plots (S-params and patterns) for a single antenna, two antennas and in larger arrays.

      Show
      A report compiling the comparison plots (S-params and patterns) for a single antenna, two antennas and in larger arrays.
    • 2
    • 2
    • 0
    • Team_HIPPO
    • Sprint 5
    • Hide

      Results and detail can be found on the confluence page (https://confluence.skatelescope.org/display/SE/SPO-2066+%3A+Validate+HARP+simulations+of+SKALA4.1). The comparison of isolated SKALA4.1 antenna was performed using two models. A model used in the FEKO simulation provided by David Ung (model_v1) and simplified has roughly 2.5x fewer mesh elements and basis functions. The impedance and the radiation pattern using model_v1 has very good agreement with FEKO simulations. The simplified model has a good agreement for higher frequencies. A comparison of two-element configuration, small 3x3 regular array, and full station in Vogel Layout (256 elements) compared to FEKO was carried out. All configurations show good agreement with the FEKO simulation on a range of tested frequencies. The AAVS2 was not tested as the minimum distance between antennas is not suitable for HARP, and further work is needed.

      Show
      Results and detail can be found on the confluence page ( https://confluence.skatelescope.org/display/SE/SPO-2066+%3A+Validate+HARP+simulations+of+SKALA4.1 ). The comparison of isolated SKALA4.1 antenna was performed using two models. A model used in the FEKO simulation provided by David Ung (model_v1) and simplified has roughly 2.5x fewer mesh elements and basis functions. The impedance and the radiation pattern using model_v1 has very good agreement with FEKO simulations. The simplified model has a good agreement for higher frequencies. A comparison of two-element configuration, small 3x3 regular array, and full station in Vogel Layout (256 elements) compared to FEKO was carried out. All configurations show good agreement with the FEKO simulation on a range of tested frequencies. The AAVS2 was not tested as the minimum distance between antennas is not suitable for HARP, and further work is needed.
    • 16.6
    • Stories Completed, Outcomes Reviewed, Satisfies Acceptance Criteria, Accepted by FO
    • PI22 - UNCOVERED

    Description

      In this PI, we want to validate the EM simulation of SKALA4.1 performed with HARP. 

      This work will consist of a comparison against other available simulation results and/or measurements. The validation will start with a single antenna (trying to match S11 and isolated pattern over the frequency band) and then will be expanded to two elements, a small array and a full station.

      The validation results will be summarized in a confluence page.

      Contact with other EM simulation teams will be needed.

       

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Structure

            Activity

              People

                m.ashdown Ashdown, Mark
                b.mort Mort, Ben
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                0 Start watching this issue

                Feature Progress

                  Story Point Burn-up: (100.00%)

                  Feature Estimate: 2.0

                  IssuesStory Points
                  To Do00.0
                  In Progress   00.0
                  Complete722.0
                  Total722.0

                  Dates

                    Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved:

                    Structure Helper Panel