Uploaded image for project: 'SAFe Program'
  1. SAFe Program
  2. SP-1489

Determine source model complexity favouring IDGpredict over direct predict

Change Owns to Parent OfsSet start and due date...
    XporterXMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Enabler
    • Won't have (this time)
    • None
    • COM SDP SW
    • None
    • Data Processing
    • Hide

      IDGpredict is likely to be computationally more attractive than direct prediction for complex source models. The complexity of the source model can be measured in terms of the number of source components (point sources, Gaussian blobs) that are fed to direct prediction. Knowing the complexity of the source model at which IDGpredict becomes computationally more attractive than direct predict for the SKA case will help to inform further development of processing functions for visibility prediction.

      Show
      IDGpredict is likely to be computationally more attractive than direct prediction for complex source models. The complexity of the source model can be measured in terms of the number of source components (point sources, Gaussian blobs) that are fed to direct prediction. Knowing the complexity of the source model at which IDGpredict becomes computationally more attractive than direct predict for the SKA case will help to inform further development of processing functions for visibility prediction.
    • Hide
      • Several source models of increasing complexity are defined.
      • The time spent in predict for these source models is recorded for both IDGpredict and direction prediction for the SKA-Low configuration.
      • The time spent in predict for these source models is recorded for both IDGpredict and direction prediction for the SKA-Mid configuration.
      • The results are presented during a demo and summarised on a Confluence page.
      Show
      Several source models of increasing complexity are defined. The time spent in predict for these source models is recorded for both IDGpredict and direction prediction for the SKA-Low configuration. The time spent in predict for these source models is recorded for both IDGpredict and direction prediction for the SKA-Mid configuration. The results are presented during a demo and summarised on a Confluence page.
    • 2
    • PI24 - UNCOVERED

    • SPO-1002

    Description

      Visibility prediction is one of the most time consuming steps in the self-calibration loop, in particular when a complex source model (many source components, diffuse emission) is involved. Prediction using Image Domain Gridding (IDG), IDGpredict, could be a computationally attractive alternative to direct prediction. However, at the moment, experience from LOFAR indicates that the crossover point at which IDGpredict computationally outperforms direct prediction lies at several thousands of source components. As system architect, I want to know where the crossover point will be for the SKA-Low and SKA-Mid arrays is (expressed in number of source components in the source model), so that I can make an informed decision on further development of processing functions for visibility prediction.

       

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Structure

            Activity

              People

                p.wortmann Wortmann, Peter
                s.wijnholds Wijnholds, Stefan
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                1 Start watching this issue

                Feature Progress

                  Story Point Burn-up: (0%)

                  Feature Estimate: 2.0

                  IssuesStory Points
                  To Do00.0
                  In Progress   00.0
                  Complete00.0
                  Total00.0

                  Dates

                    Created:
                    Updated:

                    Structure Helper Panel