Functional integration report

integrate existing TM, SDP, DSH, LFAA, CSP, SAT functional architecture to enable:

1) run specific analysis for specific concerns

2) cross-check ICD with data flows

For reference only Gerard's email:

1. Functional Integration – as a follow-on from the original Functional Analysis, it is vital that we integrate the “as-designed” functional views from a SW perspective, across the ICD interfaces, to show that we have an integrated design at CDR. This is an essential part of demonstrating that we understand the overall SW architecture and that it links to the various Element designs. This will also serve as a one of the means of documenting the Design Intent at the top level, and show the present/new interfaces between Elements & Products. You should produce two top-level A0 drawings (for Mid & Low) showing the major SW functions and dataflows, but to sufficient depth that it clarifies “which product does what” (this would be the detail underlying the existing work on -SARCH-123- but would require more detailed functional analysis and models), and the focus of ensuring that we have an integrated design across the SW interfaces. Going forward this would hopefully extend into modelling of the TANGO devices and link to the actual SW design, fulfilling the SAFe ideal of faster learning cycles based on models. MC, I know you also have lots to contribute on how to do this, so I’m happy for you to amend what I tried to describe. Should involve the two Telescope SE’s as they have worked with the present PA.