Uploaded image for project: 'SAFe Program'
  1. SAFe Program
  2. SP-1233

Compare screen-based DD imaging with facet-based DD imaging for SKA1-LOW

Details

    • Data Processing
    • Hide

      To achieve high-quality imaging results with the SKA, we need to understand the trade-offs between, e.g., computational demands and image quality across the field-of-view for various available imaging approaches. Here we look into the impact of screen-based vs. facet-based DD correction during imaging.

      Show
      To achieve high-quality imaging results with the SKA, we need to understand the trade-offs between, e.g., computational demands and image quality across the field-of-view for various available imaging approaches. Here we look into the impact of screen-based vs. facet-based DD correction during imaging.
    • Hide
      • SKA-LOW simulated data with known A-terms are imaged using IDG
      • SKA-LOW simulated data with known A-terms are imaged using WSClean as-is
      • WSClean is tuned to do facet-based imaging (stretch)
      • SKA-LOW simulated data with known a-terms are imaged using facet-based approach in WSClean (stretch)
      • Report on comparison of the results
      Show
      SKA-LOW simulated data with known A-terms are imaged using IDG SKA-LOW simulated data with known A-terms are imaged using WSClean as-is WSClean is tuned to do facet-based imaging (stretch) SKA-LOW simulated data with known a-terms are imaged using facet-based approach in WSClean (stretch) Report on comparison of the results
    • 5
    • 5
    • 5
    • Team_SCHAAP
    • Sprint 5
    • Hide
      • W-tiling was implemented in IDG. This technique reduces the memory usage significantly and reduces execution time by a factor ~2.5. This allows to make images of 30k-by-30k and larger on "normal" compute nodes.
      • A bug was solved that caused incorrect imaging for non-centred facets.
      • To isolate imaging from calibration, we needed to reconstruct the beam and ionospheric screen used in the simulation. For this, we used the OSKAR infrastructure to do this. Unfortunately, a coordinate issue in OSKAR was solved between the time the SKA-LOW simulated data sets were created and the time at which we tried to reconstruct the beams and screens that went into that simulation causing imperfect reconstruction.
      • For this reason, we decided to follow another path as outlined in AST-181, which will be demonstrated at System Demo 9.1 on December 16, 2020.
      Show
      W-tiling was implemented in IDG. This technique reduces the memory usage significantly and reduces execution time by a factor ~2.5. This allows to make images of 30k-by-30k and larger on "normal" compute nodes. A bug was solved that caused incorrect imaging for non-centred facets. To isolate imaging from calibration, we needed to reconstruct the beam and ionospheric screen used in the simulation. For this, we used the OSKAR infrastructure to do this. Unfortunately, a coordinate issue in OSKAR was solved between the time the SKA-LOW simulated data sets were created and the time at which we tried to reconstruct the beams and screens that went into that simulation causing imperfect reconstruction. For this reason, we decided to follow another path as outlined in AST-181, which will be demonstrated at System Demo 9.1 on December 16, 2020.
    • 14.2
    • Stories Completed, Outcomes Reviewed, Demonstrated
    • PI22 - UNCOVERED

    • SPO-708

    Description

      Image Domain Gridding (IDG) applies DD corrections during imaging assuming that the DD gains are spatially smooth. Facet-based imagers, on the other hand, assume the DD gains to be piece-wise constant within each facet. We want to compare these two approaches using SKA-LOW simulated data with a priori known A-term, i.e., we want to compare the two imaging approaches without complicating factors like calibration (errors) and pre-processing, which can be investigated in future tickets.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Structure

            Activity

              People

                r.laing Laing, Robert
                s.wijnholds Stefan Wijnholds
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                1 Start watching this issue

                Feature Progress

                  Story Point Burn-up: (100.00%)

                  Feature Estimate: 5.0

                  IssuesStory Points
                  To Do00.0
                  In Progress   00.0
                  Complete44.5
                  Total44.5

                  Dates

                    Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved:

                    Structure Helper Panel