Loading...

Xporter

XML

Word

Printable

ARTs:

Obs Mgt & Controls
Acceptance criteria:
Hide

Document(s) reporting on rationale, investigations and conclusions of architectural decisions;

Identification of SAFe features for future further definition or implemantion of decisions;

Identification of any issues requiring wider inputs or decisions (e.g. raised to SKAO SAFe Architecture Team, or SEs);

(potentially) updates to MCCS SAO/SAD documents
Show
Document(s) reporting on rationale, investigations and conclusions of architectural decisions; Identification of SAFe features for future further definition or implemantion of decisions; Identification of any issues requiring wider inputs or decisions (e.g. raised to SKAO SAFe Architecture Team, or SEs); (potentially) updates to MCCS SAO/SAD documents
Feature Points:
0.8
Initial Size:
0.8
WSJF:
0
Epic Link:
LFAA Development and MVP Integration
Agile Teams:

Team_MCCS
Due Sprint:
Sprint 5
Story Point Burn-up:
Overdue:
Resolved PI.Sprint:
7.6

This is to decide architecture-level enablers, and think about implications:

Determine the “real” nature of StationBeam (is “hardware-like” Tango object correct?)
Figure out how to manage the asynchronous processes without involving the TM-level scheduler
Elaborate the resource-management functions & where/how they will be implemented
Clarify low-power support
Clarify the nature of "antenna" device - mapping to power control, static attributes
(longer-term/lower priority) What is the implementation of TransientBuffer going to involve? TransientVoltageBuffer?

Outcomes:

Story Point Burn-up: (100.00%)

Feature Estimate: 0.8

Architecture Clarification – enablers